Saturday, February 28, 2009
Oklahoma House Democrats to fight GOP bills
BY MICHAEL MCNUTT
Published: March 1, 2009
To comment on this article, click here.
Oklahoma House Democrats promise to make more noise as legislation favored by the in-control Republicans is taken up on the chamber’s floor in the next two weeks.
Many bemoan that legislation they authored did not make it out of committees by last week’s deadline. In some committees, Democrats didn’t speak out against measures they were against.
"The opposition will begin now,” said House Democratic leader Danny Morgan of Prague. "What you’re going to see from the Democratic caucus is a lot more activity from us on the floor so that the arguments against these pieces of legislation can be heard by the entire body and not a half-dozen committee members.
"I don’t know that I’ve ever seen this caucus quite as invigorated as it is right now. Sometimes, failure promotes energy.”
House Republican leaders got all their key issues through committees — no surprise as Republicans control the House 61-40.
House Speaker Chris Benge had all his key proposals — including bills promoting the use of alternative fuels through tax breaks and other incentives — passed unanimously out of committees.
"It’s been a good, productive, first four weeks,” said Benge, R-Tulsa. "We’ve got a lot of good things going. The budget (shortfall) still is going to be a challenge, of course, but I feel good about things to this point.”
Democrats lost their showdown with Republicans over the autism insurance coverage mandate during a committee hearing on the second day of this year’s session.
Benge said more study is needed on the cost of mandating coverage.
GOP autism bill advances
Republicans got their proposal on how to deal with children with autism passed out of committee and eliminated any chance legislators would consider for the next two years the Democratic-backed idea of requiring insurance companies to cover children with autism.
The House Republican measure, by House Speaker Pro Tempore Kris Steele of Shawnee, calls for enacting a licensing process for national board-certified behavioral analysts and expanding state programs that train doctors to diagnose and treat autism.
Still, Morgan said Democrats will try to keep alive the concept of insurance companies being required to cover treatment for children with autism.
Morgan said he’s disappointed two measures he filed didn’t get heard by committees — establishing a no-call list for businesses and prohibiting drivers under the age of 18 from being able to use cell phones while driving.
Other measures by Republicans that passed committees include making English the official language, cracking down on puppy mills and changing how workers’ compensation judges are picked.
A proposal by Rep. Jason Murphey, R-Guthrie, to allow faculty members and those who have concealed gun permits along with firearms training to carry concealed weapons on college campuses remained bottled up in committee. Murphey, noting the Senate killed a similar measure, said he may wait until next session to bring out a campus guns bill.
Lawmakers question erectile dysfunction coverage
FAIRNESS
Sen. Tom Adelson: He wonders why autism is not covered by insurance companies that cover erectile dysfunction.
By BARBARA HOBEROCK World Capitol Bureau
Published: 2/26/2009
OKLAHOMA CITY — Democratic senators are questioning why insurance companies can cover the treatment of erectile dysfunction and not autism.
The 22 Senate Democrats asked a state agency Wednesday to determine how much could be saved if the Legislature banned insurance companies that don't cover autism from covering erectile dysfunction.
The request was sent to Bill W. Crain, administrator of the Oklahoma State Education Employees Group Insurance Board.
"We have been told by Republicans that it is not fair for those who do not have autism to have to pay for coverage for those who do," said Sen. Tom Adelson, D-Tulsa.
"Why is it fair for those who do not suffer from erectile dysfunction to pay for those who do in the form of higher premiums? I would think most Oklahomans would rather have their premiums cover children with autism, rather than people with erectile dysfunction."
The state does not mandate coverage for erectile dysfunction but does mandate prostate screenings and exams, said Amber England, a spokeswoman for the Senate Democrats.
"We know insurance companies cover the treatment of erectile dysfunction," England said.
A bill to require insurance companies to cover autism died in the House and can't be revived for two years. A similar measure did not get a hearing in the Senate.
Adelson said Senate Democrats could amend a bill to ban insurance companies from covering the treatment of erectile dysfunction if they don't cover autism.
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, said he has prepared two other amendments intended to help families of children with autism.
One would ban insurance companies that don't provide autism coverage from receiving state incentives, such as tax credits for creating jobs, Gumm said.
Another would make the state's health insurance "high-risk pool" cover autism, Gumm said. The high-risk pool is for those who can't get insurance anywhere else, he said.
Erectile dysfunction and insurance
By Staff Reports
Published: 2/28/2009
To comment on story, click here.
In today's Tulsa World Democrat Senators are wanting to know why insurance companies are paying for those with erectile dysfuntion and not for autism. There needs to be a case for fighting this. Maybe the insurance companies will think twice about this. If they don't, maybe they should cut off those with erectile dysfuntion, (not pun intended) paying their insurance.
Clayton L. Riggs, Independence, Kansas
Oklahoma political parties spar over insurance measures
Published: February 27, 2009
to comment on the article, click here.
The Republican-led Senate is protecting insurance companies and ignoring important issues for Oklahoma families, Senate Democrats said Thursday.
Advertisement
Senate President Pro Tempore Sen. Glenn Coffee, R-Oklahoma City, called Democrats’ comments "over the top.”
Four weeks into the legislative session, Democrats said the Republican leadership refused to hear bills that would affect the health insurance industry and help families. Republicans hold a 26-22 majority in the Senate.
Earlier this year, the Senate passed a rule that required a financial impact statement with all bills that would increase required coverage insurance companies must provide.
Democrats said many bills meant to help families were not heard in committee and won’t be debated on the Senate floor. One of those bills is "Nick’s Law,” which would require insurance companies to cover treatment for autism.
"For whatever reason, they can’t live up to their pro-family rhetoric. Talk’s cheap in this business,” said Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, who authored Nick’s Law. "There are families out there who are being torn asunder by the challenges brought on them because they have a child with autism.”
Earlier in the session, a House committee heard the bill and voted it down. Under House rules, the measure can’t be taken up again for two years.
Another bill that didn’t get heard was Sen. Andrew Rice’s bill that would require insurance companies to cover people who choose experimental treatments. The Oklahoma City Democrat said the bill wasn’t heard in committee, but has been attached to a bill that will be heard by the full Senate.
"Why is it they’re afraid to allow their members vote on legislation that polling shows is very popular?” Rice said. "Why not let it come up to the light of day and let everybody have an up or down vote?”
Insurance companies are not without fault, but the Democrats are just doing the bidding of trial lawyers, Coffee said.
"We’ve all had experiences with insurance companies where we know they’ve abused their authority and power, and I think they ought to be held accountable for that,” Coffee said. "At the same time, I wish the Democrats would be honest about the fact that they’ve become shills for the trial lawyer community.”
Oklahoma GOP kills revived autism measure
BY MICHAEL MCNUTT
Published: February 27, 2009
To comment on the article, click here.
State House Republicans quashed an effort Thursday to revive the issue of requiring insurers to provide coverage for children with autism.
House Democratic floor leader Mike Brown proposed an amendment that no Oklahoma insurance carrier could provide coverage for erectile dysfunction unless it also provided coverage for autism spectrum disorders.
The amendment was killed along party lines, 59-37.
"It’s a crying shame that we allow insurance companies to cover pleasure over the needs of children in Oklahoma,” said Brown of Tahlequah.
Some loopholes
Under Brown’s amendment, insurance companies, regardless of whether they offered coverage for children with autism, could still cover erectile dysfunction for men who suffer from prostate cancer, an accident or other medical problems.
"This would only prohibit insurance companies from providing coverage for your sexual pleasure unless they provide coverage for kids with autism,” Brown said.
A bill to require insurance companies to cover autism was killed by a House committee earlier this session and can’t be revived for two years.
A similar measure did not get a hearing in the state Senate.
"I’m going to keep it on the forefront until we address this problem,” the Tahlequah lawmaker said.
Autism lawsuit waits on insurer
Friday, February 27, 2009
Detroit
Judge tells Blues to respond to parents' bid for therapy coverage or case will proceed.
Jennifer Chambers / The Detroit News
DETROIT -- A federal court judge was poised Thursday to grant class-action status to a lawsuit by parents of autistic children who want Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Michigan to pay for behavioral therapy, but agreed to give the insurer more time to file a response in the case.
U.S. District Judge Stephen Murphy told Blue Cross attorney Scott Hamilton that because there was no response from Blue Cross on the record as to why he should oppose class certification, he was willing to grant the motion. But because he was impressed with Hamilton's earlier arguments, he would allow the attorney time to file a response.
"Otherwise I will grant that motion as unopposed," Murphy said.
Christopher Johns, a Warren father whose 7-year-old son is autistic, is suing Blue Cross on behalf of people who have been denied claims on the basis that applied behavioral analysis treatment for their autistic child is experimental. Johns filed the suit in federal court in May and is seeking a class action because more than 7,000 children in Michigan have autism, a neurological disorder that can cause children to become withdrawn, nonverbal and avoid eye contact.
Data from the federal government shows that 1 in 150 American children has the disorder.
Officials with the insurance group have said long-term studies on autism educational therapies have been inconclusive and the treatments are experimental. Michigan law doesn't mandate coverage for such therapies.
"Time is a real factor, in this case," said Gerard Mantese, Johns' lawyer. "Children with autism who are between 2 and 7 can make great progress with these programs. We want to move forward as fast as we can." There's no cure for autism, but research shows that early intervention through intensive therapies and other services can improve development, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Oklahoma Democrats say GOP protecting insurance companies.
Published: February 26, 2009
Oklahoma Senate Democrats are charging that Republicans are taking the side of insurance companies over the needs of their constituents.
Democratic leaders held a news conference Thursday to decry decisions by GOP leaders not to hear their insurance-related bills, including a measure to require insurance companies to cover autism in their health care policies.
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, said Republicans are forsaking their pro-family ideals by killing insurance bills that help families dealing with critical health care needs.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn Coffee called the Democratic comments "over the top" and not helpful to their cause.
Coffee, R-Oklahoma City, said he is still hopeful a compromise can be worked out that will improve the plight of families with autistic children.
He criticized Gumm for saying Republicans had "put a gun to children's heads" by not passing Gumm's autism mandate bill. Such comments, Coffee said, are counterproductive.
Gumm said earlier he was "absolutely aghast" that autism coverage had become a partisan issue in Oklahoma, when it had been passed in other states such as Louisiana with backing from Republicans.
Democrats said Republicans have shown a pattern in recent years of summarily rejecting legislation opposed by the insurance industry.
In defeating such bills, GOP lawmakers have generally said mandates sought by Democrats would drive up the cost of insurance too much.
"It's not our obligation in the Senate to make sure the insurance companies make money," said Sen. Jim Wilson, D-Tahlequah.
Coffee said it was not like Republicans are not saying the insurance companies do not have faults and "all wear white hats."
He said Democrats are not giving enough credit to a bill sponsored by Rep. Chris Steele, R-Shawnee, to increase the number of providers of autism services in the state.
He said Steele's bill will be the vehicle for any compromise that can be worked out on autism.
News 9 State Dems say Republicans aren't Pro-family
Posted: Feb 26, 2009 04:42 PM
Click here to watch video
State Democrats Say Republicans Aren't Pro-Family
Senate Democrats said numerous bills that would help ordinary Oklahomans, bills like Nick's Law to require coverage for treatment of autism, have been killed by the GOP this session. Many of them never even went to a vote.
The author of Nick's Law joined other Democrats at a news conference Thursday afternoon, and said, while Republicans try to sweep proposed solutions under the carpet, the problem doesn't go away.
By Alex Cameron, NEWS 9
OKLAHOMA CITY -- Senate Democrats are criticizing Republicans for failing to act on bills they said would help children and families in our state. State Democrats are charging the new Republican majority with protecting the interests of insurance companies, at the expense of ordinary citizens.
Senate Democrats said numerous bills that would help ordinary Oklahomans, bills like Nick's Law to require coverage for treatment of autism, have been killed by the GOP this session. Many of them never even went to a vote.
The author of Nick's Law joined other Democrats at a news conference Thursday afternoon, and said, while Republicans try to sweep proposed solutions under the carpet, the problem doesn't go away.
"There are children we are losing every single day that we delay, who will never be able to be brought out of the shadows of autism, because we continue to debate and delay in this capitol." Democratic Sen. Jay Paul Gumm said. "For whatever reason, the House of Representatives in this state, and now, to some degree, the Republicans in the Senate, can't live up to their pro-family rhetoric."
House leaders said they are pro-family. Legislation to increase the number of qualified autism service providers will help families. What won't help them, they said, is mandating a new insurance benefit.
"Whenever insurance mandates are enacted, and those cost increases are incurred, the insurance companies don't bear those costs. The insurance companies absolutely do not bear those costs, policy holders bear those costs. You and I and anyone who has an insurance policy will be the one to pay the higher costs, and so to say that we're carrying water for the insurance companies, is just absolutely bogus to me," House Speaker Chris Benge said.
Republican leaders said they are trying to look out for the interests of all Oklahomans, and said legislating a new insurance benefit will just push health care costs up for everyone.
Senate Democrats try hard line on autism treatment coverage
by Janice Francis-Smith
The Journal Record February 26, 2009
OKLAHOMA CITY – No Viagra without autism coverage. That was the new rallying cry taken up by Senate Democrats on Wednesday. Insurance companies that do not offer coverage for treatment of autism spectrum disorders should be prohibited from providing coverage for treatment of erectile dysfunction, said the Democrat leadership in the state Senate.
“We think it’s grossly unfair that insurance companies will cover something like ED but they’re not willing to cover autism treatments,” said Senate Democratic Leader, Sen. Charlie Laster, D-Shawnee.
All 22 Democrat senators signed a Feb. 25 letter asking the Oklahoma State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board to prepare a financial impact statement and cost-savings analysis for a proposal to prohibit insurance companies from offering erectile dysfunction benefits without also offering autism benefits.
No legislation has been filed regarding the matter, said Laster, but lawmakers are within their authority to ask for the study.
“You can’t get it if you don’t ask,” said Laster.
The letter also asks the Insurance Board to explain the methodology used to make their determination. Laster said he didn’t know how soon the board would be able to conclude the study.
Laster said Senate Democrats have been informed that many health insurance providers cover erectile dysfunction treatment. National studies published by industry analysts estimated that private employer health plans cover between 40 percent and 70 percent of prescriptions for erectile dysfunction, usually if the ED results from a documented medical condition. In 2005, federal administrators announced the Medicare prescription drug benefit would cover impotence drugs.
Senate Democrats have a press conference planned for Thursday to accuse the Republican majority of “using their new power to protect insurance companies,” according to a media advisory for the event. Though the Republican majority has already defeated legislation to require health insurance companies to cover autism treatments, effectively putting the issue to rest for this year’s session and next year’s as well, Senate Democrats say they plan to use the amendment process to bring insurance reform to a vote on the Senate floor.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Democrats want ED impact statement
By RON JENKINS
Associated Press Writer
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) -- Oklahoma Senate Democrats said they are amazed that some insurance companies pay for treating erectile dysfunction, while denying coverage for autism.
All 22 Democrats in the 48-member Senate signed a letter on Wednesday asking for a cost savings analysis in the event lawmakers barred insurance companies from covering ED if they refuse to cover the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorders.
The letter was sent to Bill W. Crain, administrator of the Oklahoma State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board.
"It is our understanding that insurance companies will pay for you to buy Viagra but they won't cover treatment for autism," said Sen. Charles Laster of Shawnee, Democratic minority leader.
"We just think it is bad policy that insurance companies get away with covering such nonessential things as treatment for ED and yet they are being protected for having to provide treatment for autism," he added.
He said he was sure many would argue that ED treatment is not nonessential "but from a public policy standpoint, I think it is pretty minor when compared with the thousands of kids out there with autism."
"It's just a discussion of priorities. Is health coverage for ED more important than coverage for autism?" added Sen. Tom Adelson, D-Tulsa, former state secretary of health.
Bills to require autism coverage have died in House and Senate committees this session after opposition from Republicans who say such mandates will cause insurance rates to increase significantly.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn Coffee, R-Oklahoma City, had no comment on the Democrats' latest tactic to keep the issue alive.
Members of the Democratic caucus plan a press conference Thursday during which they said they would "express frustration over Senate Republicans' disturbing pattern of protecting insurance companies on the backs of Oklahoma's working and middle class."
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, is the main sponsor of the autism coverage bill that died in committee.
Gumm said he has an amendment planned for a tax bill that would prohibit insurance companies from qualifying for premium tax credits or job creation incentives if they do not cover autism.
He said he has prepared another amendment to require the Oklahoma High Risk Insurance Pool to cover autism.
He said neither proposal would be a mandate on private insurance companies.
Senate Democrats question insurance companies' autism policy
Tulsa World Capitol Bureau
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
2/25/2009 9:35:09 PM
OKLAHOMA CITY — Democratic senators are questioning why insurance companies can cover the treatment of erectile dysfunction and not autism.
The 22 Senate Democrats on Wednesday asked a state agency to determine how much could be saved if the Legislature banned insurance companies that don’t cover autism from covering erectile dysfunction.
The request was sent to Bill W. Crain, administrator of the Oklahoma State Education Employees Group Insurance Board.
“We have been told by Republicans that it is not fair for those who do not have autism to have to pay for coverage for those who do,” said Sen. Tom Adelson, D-Tulsa. “Why is it fair for those who do not suffer from erectile dysfunction to pay for those who do in the form of higher premiums? I would think most Oklahomans would rather have their premiums cover children with autism, rather than people with erectile dysfunction.”
The state does not mandate coverage for erectile dysfunction but does mandate prostrate screenings and exams, said Amber England, a spokeswoman for Senate Democrats.
“We know insurance companies cover the treatment of erectile dysfunction,” England said.
A bill to require insurance companies to cover autism died in the House and can’t be revived for two years. A similar measure did not get a hearing in the Senate.
Adelson said Senate Democrats could amend a bill to ban insurance companies from covering the treatment of erectile dysfunction if they don’t cover autism.
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, said he has prepared two other amendments intended to help families of children with autism.
One would ban insurance companies that don’t provide autism coverage from receiving state incentives, such as tax credits for creating jobs, Gumm said.
Another would make the state’s health insurance “high-risk pool” cover autism, Gumm said. The high-risk pool is for those who can’t get insurance anywhere else, he said.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Bill seeks to streamline children's services
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - The Senate Rules Committee has voted to create Oklahoma's first-ever Children's Cabinet to improve state services for children.
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, a Democrat from Durant, says the legislation will endeavor to remove barriers that prevent Oklahoma children from living healthy lives and maximizing their potential.
Gumm says Oklahoma ranks among the 10 worst states in infant mortality, teenage death rates and child poverty.
The Children's Cabinet would be comprised of 15 officials whose agencies have interest in children's issues. The Oklahoma Commission on Children and Youth would provide support staff.
The bill now goes to the full Senate for consideration.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
It's Not OK to Kill!
http://throughtheeyesofautism.wordpress.com/2009/02/15/its-not-ok-to-kill/
Posted on February 15, 2009 by Adonya Wong
Some Oklahomans won’t ever get it.
I can understand some of their concerns, but it would have been really nice if these “lawmakers” had actually taken the time to hear the bill.
It would have been nice if they had taken the time to review the laws of the states that have already passed similar laws.
It would have been nice, but I guess nice isn’t part of their vocabulary.
I do not know what the next steps will be as I am certain the “fight” is not over. It’s just very unfortunate that the Oklahoma children with autism will have to wait more months or years before the “lawmakers” decide in their favor.
Unfortunately, this decision will prove too late for most.
“You’re doing fine, Oklahoma!” {sigh}
Washington Times - Autism hopes
Washington Times
Sunday, February 15, 2009
DRISCOLL/O'HANLON: Autism hopes
Karen Driscoll and Michael O'Hanlon
COMMENTARY:
As parents of affected children, we are encouraged by President Obama's commitment to improve the lives of individuals with autism and increase the government's response to this virtual epidemic, which now affects an estimated 1 in 150 young people in our country.
Most will remain challenged by the effects of autism spectrum disorders throughout their lives.
There is much to do. While research budgets have increased in recent years, thanks to the admirable efforts of organizations like Autism Speaks and the Autism Society of America as well as key lawmakers and other officials, scientific study of this challenge - or more likely, this set of related but distinct and complex challenges - remains relatively underfunded. Worse yet, perhaps just 10 percent of affected children receive the kind of intense and effective treatments that can move them toward recovery and greatly improve their overall quality of life.
The ideal solution is legislation mandating that medical insurance plans cover autism therapy costs without delay, such as that already enacted in eight states and now being considered in Maryland (though similar efforts in Virginia appear to have just been stymied).
But in the interim, President Obama can take at least two immediate steps - ideally in his first 100 days - to improve the well-being of a significant portion of the affected population and set a standard that the broader insurance market might then be cajoled and pressured to emulate. First, he can mandate that the Defense Department's TRICARE health plan revise its current policy and more fully cover the costs of necessary treatments for military children. Second, he can direct the Office of Personnel Management to require that health insurers for federal civilian employees provide a similar level of reimbursement.
Today, most medical insurers refuse to cover the costs of autism treatments. They invoke the bogus argument that treatment methods are experimental, even when endorsed by organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Careful studies consistently show that one-third to half of children receiving intensive, early treatment can be mainstreamed in school. Many can later then hold jobs and maintain interpersonal relationships. Or insurers leave it to schools to address the challenge, claiming treatment methods are educational rather than medical.
They do so though early intervention should start well before the school-age years, and though the methods of treating autism resemble the kinds of rehabilitative care used to help brain-injured patients - methods widely recognized to be medical in nature.
This is fundamentally unfair. As a nation we provide generous health-care coverage for most classic medical conditions. For example, Medicare has just decided to expand coverage for many experimental cancer drugs for older individuals. This is the right kind of compassion for a wealthy and humane society to adopt. But if we can do it for sick, elderly cancer patients, why not for young and promising individuals with autism - who have their whole lives before them? While autism therapies are also imperfect, and also evolving, they are at least as effective as many of these kinds of new cancer drugs.
Like effective treatments for cancer, early intensive intervention can be described as expensive. But we need to keep costs and benefits in mind. Any individual who benefits from this intervention and is able to function independently in a typical classroom rather than in special education could recoup the costs to society before even leaving school. An individual who winds up able to hold a job rather than spend a lifetime on unemployment and Medicaid saves the state at least a million dollars.
And for those most seriously afflicted, if early intervention helps them live at home or in a group home rather than in an institutional setting, lifetime savings can reach well into the several million dollar range.
The specific steps we recommend for President Obama are within his purview and hardly radical to contemplate. TRICARE already provides dependents of active-duty service members up to $30,000 a year in reimbursement for autism therapy, particularly for the category of interventions known as behavioral intervention since these have received the most study. As such it has correctly accepted the principle of helping families, but the dollar limit on reimbursement provides less than half of what many must spend. Since these are military families with generally modest incomes, remaining out-of-pocket costs can easily represent half or more of disposable income, necessitating families to take out second mortgages or otherwise go deeply into debt even as a parent may be deploying overseas to a combat theater.
The best approach would be to treat autism therapy as a basic medical treatment under TRICARE's reimbursement concept, rather than a supplemental benefit managed under the ECHO program that creates barriers and limits on care. A second-best approach would be raise the dollar limit to at least $60,000 a year, expand coverage to all TRICARE beneficiaries, and then index it for inflation and the cost of living.
As for civilian federal employees, the OPM has the power to set the parameters of health plans offered these individuals. And there is nothing radical about our proposal that such plans cover autism therapy, again at least in the range of $60,000 a year. Eight states already have legislation mandating that private health plans in their states cover mainstream autism therapy treatment programs. Dozens more states have bills pending on the same.
And while the cost implications of such a mandate would be nontrivial, by our estimates they would reflect about one-quarter of 1 percent of current health-care costs on a per capita basis.
Having set these examples, President Obama would then have encouraged and empowered activists and state legislators and other key parties to push onward themselves to create a national system in which some of our most vulnerable - facing severe yet largely remediable problems - get the kind of help our nation has denied them far too long.
Karen Driscoll is the wife of a U.S. Marine. Michael O'Hanlon is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/15/autism-hopes/Friday, February 13, 2009
Senator Gumm's "Senate Minute" for Feb. 13-19, 2009
Alva man pleads guilty to torture charges
Editor's note: We will see more cases like this, deal with more monsters like this, if we continue down our current path of not providing for our children with autism. This is a warning to our legislators about the oncoming storm.
By the Associated Press Feb 13, 2009ALVA - A 21-year-old man has pleaded guilty to charges in the videotaped torture of a mentally disabled man in Woods County.
Jesse Thomas Wallace pleaded guilty in Woods County District Court in Alva to felony charges of assault and battery with a deadly weapon and maiming.
Wallace was sentenced to nine years in prison and ordered to write a letter of apology to the victim.
Wallace and Marvin Tarver were accused of using a coat hanger to brand the autistic man and of shooting him with an air pistol and a paintball gun.
The attack was videotaped then transferred to DVD and Wallace acknowledged he had hoped to sell the DVDs.
Charges against Tarver are pending.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Utah autism insurance mandate clears first hurdle |
By Heather May The Salt Lake Tribune |
Despite opposition from insurance companies and a small business association, a bill that would mandate coverage of autism therapy for children passed a Senate committee Thursday. Called "Clay's Law," SB 43 would require insurance to pay up to $50,000 a year for early behavioral therapy, which typically involves one-on-one instruction at least 25 hours a week. Eight other states require similar coverage, and Nevada lawmakers are expected to pass an autism bill as well. Utah has one of the highest rates of autism, with 1 in 133 children affected, compared to the national rate of 1 in 150. To accommodate the large crowd of parents and children who appeared in support of the bill, the Senate Health and Human Services moved to a larger room. The group cheered and clapped after the committee voted 5-1 for the bill. It now moves to the Senate floor. "Every kid needs and should have a life as great as mine. I love being me," said Clay Whiffen, the 8-year-old for whom the bill is named. Diagnosed with autism as a child, boy received therapy because his Highland parents were able to afford the $60,000 cost. He told the senators he now likes to write in cursive, talk with his friends and can hold a handstand for six seconds. "Just being a kid is hard enough," he said. "Having autism is a whole lot worse." Another parent with three autistic children said she had to choose which child to help because she couldn't afford full time therapy for all of them. Noting one of her children had cancer, she said she would choose a cancer diagnosis over autism because of insurance coverage. Fraser Bullock, who was in charge of the 2002 Winter Olympics' budget, also spoke in favor of the bill. His granddaughter has autism, but he was able to help pay for the expensive treatment. Now managing director of the Utah-based private equity firm Sorenson Capital, Bullock said business owners he contacted support the mandate even though they will bear some of the costs. "This cost does not give us a second thought," he said. No fiscal note has been attached, but supporters and opponents estimate it will cost the state $1 million a year to cover government employees. Supporters also say it would increase private premium costs by less than 1 percent. Jim Olsen, president of the Utah Retail Merchants Association, said those incremental costs add up. More of his members are dropping insurance coverage for their employees altogether due to escalating premium costs, in part due to unfunded mandates, he said. Kelly Atkinson, executive director of the Utah Health Insurance Association, also spoke against the bill, saying the mandate would only apply to 33 percent of insured Utahns. For two-thirds of the families in the room, "nothing you do today will impact them." After nearly 90 minutes of testimony, senators had little time to debate the bill. They wondered how effective the treatment is -- up to 50 percent of children could become indistinguishable from their peers, according to a pediatrician -- and whether the diagnosis of autism is reliable since it requires observation instead of, for example, a lab test. Only Sen. Allen Christensen, R-North Ogden, voted against the bill. Noting that he is fighting to save funding for autism preschools and a registry to track the prevalence and risk factors for autism, he said the bill shifts money from one group to another. "Where do we draw the line with mandates?" he asked. But sponsoring Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, said young families pay for therapies for older people and now it's others' turn to help them. "This is an appropriate conservative approach," he said. |
McCarville Report Online
Autism Bill Draws Support, Discussion
http://wwwtmrcom.blogspot.com/2009/02/autism-bill-draws-support-discussion.htmlDemocratic Floor Leader Mike Brown, D-Tahlequah, and Rep. Joe Dorman, D-Rush Springs, today praised the passage of a bill designed to enhance services for autism in the state, but cautioned that the bill may not do enough to help families of children with this disease. “I am grateful for the opportunity to work with Speaker Pro Tem Kris Steele to ensure this bill is as effective as possible,” Brown said. “I’ve always believed that we can craft good legislation by reaching across the aisle to share our concerns and then allow full debate by the good public servants of the House of Representatives." Brown and Steele, R-Shawnee, collaborated on improving language to HB2027 before it was introduced on the House floor to ensure that the bill would remain in full compliance with existing statutes. “I’ve visited with administrators at Northeastern State University, and they’re ready to implement this training program. As soon as this funding comes through, they are set to start training autism providers,” Brown added. “This bill, however, remains only a partial solution to the greater problem of helping families of children with autism,” Brown stated. “They face greater challenges not addressed by this bill, such as paying for costly treatment for their children. Since many insurance companies don’t cover care for autism, even families who can afford private insurance may not be able to afford treatment – so how will these new providers afford to stay in Oklahoma?” Dorman joined Brown in praising passage of the bill, but also held reservations whether this bill does enough to help Oklahoma families. “My greatest concern is that without a way to ensure these providers a mechanism for payment, we’ll experience a ‘brain drain’ and lose them to other states,” said Dorman. “Training more autism providers is an excellent step in the right direction, but I am concerned especially for people in rural areas that they will still be unable to find autism specialists or pay for their services.”
Legislative Follies - Oklahoma Observer
February 12, 2009
BY ARNOLD HAMILTON
http://www.okobserver.net/2009/02/12/legislative-follies/
Can we really be this backward?
I’ve long told people the Legislature is more representative of this state than many of us care to admit - but the last two days in the House were astonishing even by Oklahoma’s low standards.
Yesterday, 20 would-be theocrats voted against a routine memorializing of the day’s session-opening prayer in the House Journal - all because the chaplain, Rev. Scott Jones of Oklahoma City’s Cathedral of Hope, is gay and had the temerity to introduce “my loving partner and fiancé, Michael.”
Today, lawmakers spent at least twice as much time debating a non-binding resolution - opposing the transfer of “terrorists” from soon-to-be closed Guantanamo Bay to Oklahoma - as they did the critically-important issue of autism.
OK, I admit, Speaker Pro Tem Kris Steele’s autism measure, HB 2027, is nothing but the thinly-disguised Insurance Industry Profits Protection Act of 2009.
Since legislative Republicans aren’t willing to demand insurers cover the epidemic - in effect choosing profits over children - they had to pass something. So they promoted this bill aimed at increasing the number of health professionals that treat autism.
Question: What good does it do to have more health professionals to treat autism if those with the malady can’t afford the care?
I marveled that Steele - a good man who’s been a regular on The Observer’s annual 10-best legislative performances scorecard - could stand before the House and, with a straight face, argue this is the best the Oklahoma Legislature could do.
So instead of facing up to this tough problem, the wingnuts did what they do best: They demagogued a straw issue - in this case, the transfer of Gitmo detainees to military brigs around the country.
It matters not to these flag-waving, Bible-thumping faux patriots that Oklahoma doesn’t even seem to be on the radar to house the detainees. [ABC News reported in mid-January the military is focused on four sites: Camp Pendleton in California, the Miramar Marine Air Station in California, Fort Leavenworth in Kansas and the U.S. Naval Consolidated Brig in South Carolina.]
What matters is whether clueless voters can be scared into thinking that a liberal Democratic president and a liberal Democratic Congress are on the verge of sending “terrorists” into the Heartland.
In the parallel universe contrived by former President George W. Bush, it doesn’t matter that the detainees [or enemy combatants] haven’t been charged with anything and haven’t been tried in a court of law to determine their guilt.
For Oklahoma’s xenophobic, redneck wingnuts, if the former administration identified them as “terrorists” then, by golly, they are. Period. End of discussion. They aren’t about to acknowledge the detainees might be more accurately described as “alleged terrorists.”
The reason: It’s a cheap, easy way to put Democrats in Oklahoma on the defensive. Can’t you just hear the radio and TV ads? Or the whispers: Rep. So-and-So is un-American. He puts the rights of terrorists over the safety of Oklahomans.
Rep. Rex Duncan of Sand Springs all but telegraphed the GOP game-plan, saying he hopes every lawmaker who voted against the resolution gets “term-limited or beat.”
Of course, what the flag-wavers don’t tell you is that they’ve been more than happy to accept all the federal largesse in recent years as Oklahoma military installations benefited from a series of BRAC decisions.
How dare the federal government demand Oklahoma keep some of the detainees under lock-and-key while their status is sorted out?
Twelve legislators had the courage to vote against the phony-baloney resolution - including 11 Democrats. Only Republican no vote was from Rep. Shane Jett of Tecumseh, who argued that in these lean economic times, it doesn’t make sense to tell the Obama Administration that Oklahoma doesn’t want federal dollars expended here.
If you’ve ever wondered why some businesses are queasy about expanding into or relocating to Oklahoma, the last two days are Exhibit A.
Bill passed to provide autism therapists
Associated Press Writer
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) -- A Republican plan setting standards for health professionals to treat autism passed the state House on Thursday, a week after a committee controlled by the GOP killed a bill to require insurance companies to cover the disorder.
Rep. Kris Steele, R-Shawnee, said there is a lack of therapists in Oklahoma to treat autism. He said his bill will create a network of training to increase the number of autism therapists.
"The most important move we can make right now is to increase the number of specialists trained to treat children with autism," Steele said.
No lawmakers opposed the plan, but several questioned how much good it will do if insurance companies are not required to cover autism diagnosis and treatment.
Last week, a committee controlled by the House Republican majority defeated a bill to mandate autism coverage. Families with autistic children have tried to no avail for two years to get mandated coverage.
Reps. Mike Brown, D-Tahlequah, and Joe Dorman, D-Rush Springs, said Steele's legislation is a step in the right direction, but questioned if it does enough to help families with autistic children.
"They face greater challenges not addressed by this bill, such as paying for costly treatment for their children," Brown said.
"Since many insurance companies don't cover autism, even families who can afford private insurance may not be able to afford treatment. So how will these new providers afford to stay in Oklahoma?"
"My greatest concern is that without a way to ensure these providers a mechanism for payment, we'll experience a brain drain and lose them to other states," Dorman said.
"Training more autism providers is an excellent step in the right direction, but I am concerned especially for people in rural areas that they will still be unable to find autism specialists or pay for their services," he added.
The bill sets up a licensing procedure for autism specialists with the Developmental Disabilities Services Division of the Department of Human Services. Therapists must be certified by the National Behavior Analyst Certification Board.
The measure provides training for treatment of children with autism as part of the Sooner Start program, which provides early intervention and treatment for children with disabilities and developmental problems.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Autism bill shot down in Oklahoma Legislature
The high point for me was the governor’s “State of the State” address.
Gov. Henry said health insurance policies in the state of Oklahoma should cover diagnosis and treatment of autism. The fight to enact “Nick’s Law” has been among my top priorities.
It says something about our values when our highest elected official reaches out to help some of our most vulnerable citizens.
You would think an effort like that would cross all political differences, uniting those of us elected to represent every Oklahoman. It did not.
While the governor’s call brought about half the lawmakers to their feet in applause, those content to allow children to suffer in silence sat on their hands.
Then came Tuesday, when — for the first time — members of the House of Representatives would be allowed to vote on a version of “Nick’s Law.” Unfortunately, “Nick’s Law” was in a committee constructed with the sole purpose to defeat this bill.
The committee was made up of nine Republicans who either opposed “Nick’s Law” or did not have the fortitude to stand up to their leadership.
Five Democrats also served on the committee
A member of the leadership who gets to vote in all committees even participated, stacking the deck even higher against kids with autism.
The debate and outcome were predictable. Those opposing “Nick’s Law” used an actuarial study they commissioned, suggesting premium costs would be much higher than the minimal costs seen in states that enacted such legislation.
In fact, the actuary they hired admitted under questioning that he was biased against autism coverage.
The bill failed right down party lines, continuing to make Oklahoma the only state where ending insurance discrimination against children with autism is a partisan issue.
To their credit, House Republicans did pass their autism bill. There is nothing wrong with it — just like there is nothing wrong with a pack of shingles at a construction site.
Their plan to increase the number of autism therapists in the state is like putting shingles on a house before you pour its foundation. It is backwards and doomed to failure.
Without helping families afford the therapies, all the therapists in the world will be useless.
After the meeting, the committee chairman proudly said the issue was dead for two years because of the House’s “final action” rule.
They may think they can hide behind cowardly rules, but these children are still here; these families are still with us.
Helping families struggling to do right is a value that is woven into most Oklahomans’ hearts.
Knowing that, I cannot understand why those members voting “no” — people who wrap themselves in the phrase “family values” — seem incapable of supporting bills that truly value families.
Thanks again for reading this week’s “Senate Minute.” Have a great week, and may God bless you all.
Monday, February 9, 2009
New Mexico moves 1 step closer for autism coverage
Associated Press - February 9, 2009 3:45 PM ET
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) - Insurance companies in New Mexico would be required to provide coverage for diagnosing and treating autism under legislation approved Monday by the Senate.
Sen. Clinton Harden, R-Clovis, said the insurance mandate would help families struggling with out-of-pocket costs of providing therapy and other services for autistic children.
Under the proposal, private group and individual insurance policies must offer autism coverage. Typically, policies do not pay for screening children for autism or treatments such as occupational and speech therapy for autistic children.
The bill passed the Senate unanimously and was sent to the House for consideration.
Friday, February 6, 2009
House Committee Kills Autism Bill
Posted: Feb 3, 2009
FEATURED VIDEO
House Committee Shoots Down Autism Bill
Autism is currently not covered by healthcare in Oklahoma, restricting many families' ability to provide treatment to children with Autism.
Autism is currently not covered by healthcare in Oklahoma, restricting many families' ability to provide treatment to children with Autism.
Parents await the committee's decision. They were outraged by the results.
Autistic disorder is characterized by impaired verbal and non-verbal communication, social interaction, some form of repetitive and restricted stereotyped interest, ritual, or other behavior.
By Dave Jordan, NEWS 9
OKLAHOMA CITY -- Oklahomans battling autism came from across the state hoping to convince the House Economic and Financial Committee that they should pass this measure, but the Republican-controlled committee did not because it felt that such a vote would cause insurance rates to spike.
Doctor Juliet Burk did everything to convince them otherwise. After her two sons were diagnosed with autism at an early age, the self-proclaimed conservative Republican left Oklahoma and moved back to her native New York state to seek treatment for her children that Oklahoma did not provide.
"Somebody said, "Where's your validation for services?" Dr. Burk said. She pointed to her son next to her.
Dr. Burk moved back to Oklahoma and now has a thriving medical practice in Tahlequah. She said her sons no longer show signs of autism and the medical care they received was cost-effective.
"These guys were not expensive because there was a funded infrastructure that they could access right away," Dr. Burk said.
Because the authors of House Bill 1312 failed to specify an insurance premium increase, the measure was shot down.
Nine voted in favor, five against, but it failed to pass.
Wayne Rhode, whose son Nick is the inspiration for the bill, is outraged.
"These folks are struggling," Rhode said. "These parents are struggling to provide what they need for these families. This is shameful."
Rhode was one of more than a dozen families who came to the capitol in support of the bill.
"I challenge them right now to look at these parents and tell these parents that their children are not going to receive any help because of this actions," Rhode said.
Representative Daniel Sullivan (R-District 71), who chaired the committee said it was a risk he didn't want to take.
"What we do not want to have occur is additional increases in premiums where people that have insurance now are added to the uninsured and it makes this whole cycle so much worse," Representative Sullivan said.
The committee passed a motion to increase the number of therapists for autistic children. It also passed a measure preventing the House from bringing Nick's Law back to committee for at least two more sessions.
A similar bill could have a chance in the Senate.
Critics of an insurance mandate believe the market will drive autism coverage. Their example is Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oklahoma, which has added limited benefits for children with autism.
House Committee Fails Nick's Law
Watch the video, click here.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009; Posted 6.40 pm (CDT)
Nick's Law, which would mandate autism coverage by insurance, failed 10 to five Tuesday evening in the Oklahoma House Economic Development and Financial Services Committee.
Only eight U.S. states have passed mandated autism coverage, but more than 30 states are either introducing or re-introducing that mandate this year.
The day after a plea from Governor Brad Henry, the committee brought the emotional topic of Nick's Law up for a vote.
"Last year we could not get a House hearing," says Wayne Rohde, a supporter of Nick's Law. "This year they've granted us one. It doesn't mean we'll have our day in the sun, so to speak, but at least we'll have a hearing for it."
Some saw the rushed schedule of hearing Nick's Law on the second day of session as a way of getting it out of the way.
"This sends up a red flag to me that this is also their answer to alleviate the pressure that they are under all across the state to do the right thing and pass this legislation," says Rep. Mike Brown, D-District 4, author of Nick's Law for the House.
After an exhausting and discouraging session last year for the many supporting autism coverage by insurance, parents and lawmakers were back for the same fight.
"I'm optimistic that House Bill 1312 will get a hearing, but I'm also very skeptical the bill will ever get past committee," says Brown.
Those affected by autism filled rooms in hopes their presence would sway a favorable vote. Wayne Rohde, a father of twins with one autistic, has been at the forefront of this battle, recognized by the autism coverage bill named after his son, Nick.
"The children don't care whether they're Republican or Democrat. They've got autism," says Brown.
But the vast majority of Republicans remain unconvinced, citing a possible increase in insurance costs, which could lead to more uninsured Oklahomans.
"Every excuse promoted last year has been disproved," says Brown.
Supporters argue that with so many affected, autism coverage shouldn't be a debate but a right.
Since Nick's Law failed in House committee, House rules state the House will not hear the bill in its current form for the next two years.
House Bill 2027 was also heard in the same committee meeting, authored by Rep. Kris Steele, R-District 26. That deals with increasing trained care providers for autistic children. It passed unanimously.
Oklahoma House committee kills autism mandate
By The Associated Press
Published: February 3, 2009
Buzz up!
OKLAHOMA CITY — Legislation to require health insurers to cover the diagnosis and treatment of autism was killed Tuesday evening by a state House committee that effectively blocked the mandate proposal from being considered in the House again for two years.
Advertisement
Click here to find out more!
Instead, the Republican-controlled House Economic Development and Financial Services Committee unanimously approved legislation to increase the number of certified therapists for autistic children.
Supporters said an autism coverage mandate would drive up health insurance rates in Oklahoma and that it is meaningless to consider one until there are enough therapists to do the job.
"The discussion we're having today, in my opinion, is premature," said House Speaker Pro Tem Kris Steele, R-Shawnee, author of the therapist bill. "We're not ready for this kind of mandate because the services do not exist."
"I don't believe that providing a promise without a solution is what we need," said the committee's chairman, Rep. Dan Sullivan, R-Tulsa.
Supporters of the mandate bill, known as "Nick's Law" after for an 11-year-old autistic boy from Edmond, Nick Rohde, argued that therapists will not move to the state to provide services to autistic children without a guaranteed revenue stream to pay them, like that provided by mandated health insurance coverage.
"Without any help, we know where they're going to end up," said the bill's author, Rep. Mike Brown, D-Tahlequah, who said taxpayers eventually will have to pay for the care of dysfunctional autistic children.
Autism is a bioneurological disability that affects communication skills in young children, many of whom also suffer from ailments such as allergies, asthma and epilepsy. Officials estimate it affects about one out of every 150 children in the U.S.
Along party lines, committee members voted 10-5 against a motion to send the autism mandate measure to the House floor as dozens of autistic children, their parents and other family members crowded into House meeting rooms to hear discussion and debate on the autism bills.
It then voted 9-5 for a do-not-pass motion that under House rules will prevent the mandate idea from being considered again until a new Legislature is seated in 2011.
"The language is dead — really dead," Brown said. "It cannot be heard for two years.
"They wanted this off the plate," Brown said of House Republican leaders. "They did not want to deal with that."
Autism mandate legislation was passed by the Senate last year but was blocked in the House. Similar legislation is pending in the Senate again, but Sullivan said he will not schedule a hearing on the bill if it reaches the House.
After the meeting, some parents held photographs of their autistic children as lawmakers left the meeting room.
"It was a foregone conclusion," said Wayne Rohde, Nick's father. "What are they telling us back there? That we don't want to help these kids to the level that we need to?"
While Medicaid covers some services for the autistic children of low-income families and the wealthy can afford to pay, middle-income families struggle to afford behavioral and occupational therapies for their children. Rohde has said he spends up to $5,000 a month for therapy for his autistic son.
"You're throwing those parents into bankruptcy," Brown said.
Eight other states have passed the same autism mandate legislation and 10 states have similar laws, Brown said. Thirty-two states are considering a mandate to provide some relief to the families of autistic children.
"And the best thing we can do is look them in the eye and tell them to move to another state?" asked Rep. John Carey, D-Durant, a member of the committee.
"That's exactly what we're doing," Brown said.
The mother of two autistic children, Dr. Juliet Burk of Tahlequah, said she left her practice in Oklahoma and moved in with family members in upstate New York where mandated therapies were provided at no direct cost. Therapies for one son cost $30,000 a year.
"We left to find a funded infrastructure," said Burk, a self-described conservative Republican who said early and intense therapy for her children helped reverse their autism diagnosis.
Brown disputed a study performed for the state House that said an autism mandate would increase health insurance rates by at least 7.8 percent and possibly as high as 19.8 percent.
Brown said other studies, including one by the Oklahoma State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board, concluded the cost would be 1 percent or less
Crushing Defeat
By World's Editorial Writers
Published: 2/6/2009
Disappointment doesn't even begin to describe the dashed hopes of families who had hoped, for the second year in a row, that Oklahoma might join several other states in mandating insurance coverage for treatment of autistic children.
House Bill 1312, "Nick's Law," was defeated in a House committee. While such a measure passed an evenly divided Senate twice last year, a similar bill in this session's Republican-led Senate is unlikely to gain traction.
Sen. Jay Paul Gumm, D-Durant, said of the panel's members: "They tore the Band-Aid off now quickly because they think they won't have to endure the public scrutiny for the next two years. I think that's a serious miscalculation on their part. These families aren't going away. These kids aren't going away."
One in every 150 children struggles with autism, the fastest-growing disability in the nation. Without early, aggressive treatment, autistic children will continue to rely on parents and when those parents die, they likely will become wards of the state, a costly proposition.
A study paid for by the House showed that costs of an autism insurance mandate would lead to a 7.8 percent increase in rates for insured Oklahomans, a figure disputed by bill supporters.
Wayne Rohde of Edmond talked Wednesday to the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee, which opposed any insurance mandates. Nick's Law is named for Rohde's son Nick, 11. Some members of the group suggested that parents should hold fundraisers or move to states that provided coverage. That is insensitive and impractical.
It is difficult to find a silver lining in defeat. The committee did pass another measure that would increase the number of autism therapists in Oklahoma — an urgent need.
Will the families try again? Probably, although the committee chairman warned that similar measures may not be taken up for the next two years. The hard road autistic children must travel in life just got harder.
By World's Editorial Writers
Gov Henry Urges Lawmakers to Reconsider Debate Ban on Autism Bill
posted 02/06/09
Oklahoma City - Gov. Brad Henry wants lawmakers to reconsider banning debate on mandating insurance coverage for autism.
Henry's comments today come two days after the House Economic Development and Financial Services Committee voted along party lines against House Bill 1312 by Tahlequah Rep. Mike Brown.
The action effectively keeps the issue from being revisited for two years. The fate of a similar measure in the Senate is uncertain.
Henry says there are good people on both sides of the issue who have different opinions. But he says the way to resolve those differences isn't with a two-year moratorium on any discussion.
Critics of the measure say it would drive up the costs for insurance coverage.
In his State of the State address Monday, Henry urged lawmakers to approve insurance coverage for autistic children.
State GOP Puts Business Profits Before People
State GOP Puts Business Profits Before People
Submitted by dochoc on Wed, 2009-02-04 17:08
If some people still think the Oklahoma Republican Party is not owned and managed by big business, they should consider its vote Tuesday to kill legislation that would force insurance companies to cover the treatment of autistic children.
A House committee voted on party lines to kill the measure with Republicans opposing the measure and Democrats favoring it. The GOP controls the House and has a majority of votes on the House Economic and Financial Services Committee. The measure was voted down despite urgent pleas from Oklahoma families with autistic children.
Despite Republican spin, this is a clear GOP vote to protect the profits and interests of health insurance companies over the care of autistic children. It’s a cruel, anti-family vote.
The Oklahoma GOP, which is now the country’s weird museum of dead right-wing ideologies, argued the mandate could increase insurance costs by 7.8 percent, but the Democrats presented evidence that contradicted this claim. Several states require health insurance companies to cover autism treatment. It’s unlikely this one mandate would have any kind of significant impact on health insurance premiums or increasing the number of uninsured.
Even if health insurance companies felt compelled to raise rates significantly because of the autism coverage, then that simply shows us how broken our health care system remains. In other words, some people get their illnesses covered; some people don’t.
The health care system in this country is in a state of crisis. The GOP here can obstruct all they want and put the profits of health insurance companies above people, but reform is coming on a national level.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma Democrats need to keep fighting for the legislation.
Parent: Autism fight surprisingly vitriolic
Parent: Autism fight surprisingly vitriolic
He says he didn't expect much support for insurance coverage for the condition but that lawmakers' comments were harsh.
Wayne Rohde reacts after House Bill 1312, which would require insurance coverage for autism, was rejected Tuesday at the state Capitol in Oklahoma City. The bill, also called Nick's Law, was named after Rhode's 11-year-old son, Nick, who has autism. BRYAN TERRY/The Oklahoman
By MICHAEL MCNUTT , NewsOK.com
Published: 2/5/2009
Wayne Rohde knew that the conservative group he talked to Wednesday would be cool to his efforts to get legislation passed to require insurance companies to provide coverage of treatment for autistic children. But some of their comments caught him by surprise.
Some members of the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee suggested to Rohde, whose 11-year-old son, Nick, is autistic, that families with autistic children should form a nonprofit organization and seek donations or get together and self-insure the payments that cost some families about $5,000 a month.
Many in the group, made up of conservative Republicans and libertarians, said they opposed the concept of state government interfering with a private industry.
One person doubted the costly behavioral treatments, saying a cream applied to a child's temples could be more effective. Another suggested that Rohde, who moved to Oklahoma 11 years ago, move back to the state where he was born and let that state take care of his family's needs.
When Rohde told the group that eight states already require insurance companies to cover autistic children, Charlie Meadows, the group's leader, asked what is wrong with families with autistic children moving to states that have passed insurance mandates.
Rohde, of Edmond, said some parents have resorted to doing that — and to taking the income taxes and other taxes they paid to the state with them.
Rohde said afterward that he doesn't know whether
he made clear his message that allowing insurance companies not to cover autistic children eventually would cost taxpayers.
A proposed bill named for Rohde's son was defeated Tuesday by a House committee. Opponents said they were concerned that forcing insurance companies to pay for autism coverage would drive up insurance costs and force some Oklahomans to drop their insurance.
A study paid for by the House showed that the costs of an autism insurance mandate would lead to at least a 7.8 percent increase in rates for insured Oklahomans.
Autism affects children in different levels, and the sooner autistic children can be diagnosed and treated, the better their chances of improving, Rohde said.
Because treatment can be expensive, middle- and lower-income families will have to depend on the state's child health-care program and public schools to provide treatment, he said.
Without early, aggressive treatment, autistic children will continue to be dependent on their parents, and after the parents die, they likely will become wards of the state, he said.